Is Programming Art?

There’s a new article on O’Reilly’s that talks about the similarities between art and computer programming. It’s along the lines of Paul Graham’s Hackers & Painters, which I’m currently reading (I’m going to put a recommended reading list up in the next week or so).

I’ve been thinking about this subject quite a bit over the past few weeks, and here is my take on it:

First, let me say that this is a purely academic discussion. There’s no benefit to objectively proving that computer programming is or isn’t an art except to brag or cry about it, whatever the case may be. I don’t think any of us plans to apply for an NEA grant in the near future.

So is programming art?

It can be.

Most programmers, probably more than 95%, resemble house painters rather than impressionist painters. I don’t mean this in a derogatory way; it has nothing to do with their ability or the prestige of the work, rather their motivation for doing the work.

If you take a starving artist, whether a musician, a writer, or a hacker (in this context I mean someone who writes really good code), he has a certain amount of desperation and passion. Every day he plays/writes/programs not because it makes him rich, but because that’s what he loves to do. It fulfills an intense desire in his soul that spurns him to create.

In this sense programming is art.

I bet that most of us started out that way; teaching ourselves Perl for fun. We built websites because we wanted to, not because they served a purpose. This resembles art: guitar players write songs because the desire burns within them. Painters create paintings because it fills an emptiness. The creation has no other purpose but to bring pleasure to those who experience it; to inspire and create emotion.

But once the writer decides to make money writing ad copy or the hacker decides to take a salaried position building business applications, some of the passion inevitably leaves the process. When an artist is not free to create from the soul but is instead told to write a jingle for Loads of Fun Laundromat or build a web page to sell “I heart your mom” bumper stickers, the emotion is lost. And art relies heavily on emotion.

For the record, I love my job and I can’t think of anything I’d rather do for a living. And although I like to think that what I build everyday is a brilliant work of art I have to be honest and realize that there is a difference between me and the starving artist down the street.

Start Small, Get Big
Growth Secrets for Self-Funded Startups. It'll Change Your Life.
What you get for signing up:
  • A 170-page ebook collecting my best startup articles from the past 5 years
  • Previously unpublished startup-related screencasts
  • Exclusive revenue-growing techniques I don't publish on this blog
"The ideas and information Rob provides should be required reading for anyone that wants to create a successful business on the web." ~ Jeff Lewis
Startups for the Rest of Us...
If you're trying to grow your startup you've come to the right place. I'm a serial web entrepreneur here to share what I've learned in my 11 years as a self-funded startup founder. Luckily several thousand people have decided to stick around and join the conversation.

For more on why you should read this blog, go here.


#1 http:// on 07.08.05 at 7:13 pm

Does that mean that doing word searches is an art as long as you enjoy it and don’t make money off of it? Maybe if you circle the words in different colors? 😉

#2 rwalling on 07.08.05 at 8:33 pm

Good point, Lee. I don’t think doing word searches would apply since there’s no creation involved. Nothing new or unique comes out of the process. In addition, I think there is a difference between enjoying something and being emotionally tied or passionate about it. I’ve seen almost religious debate about painting, writing, and programming (most of all in programming)…but word searching? I just don’t feel like it has the same emotional buy-in as the others. But this is obviously a judgment on my part. Thanks for your comment, Rob